Tomatoville® Gardening Forums - View Single Post

Cole_Robbie · December 8, 2015

You're looking at the "watt equivalent" number. My 65 is the actual watts consumed. I thought it was a 300 watt equivalent, but the Menard's link lists an "incandescent equivalent" number of 260 watts:
http://www.menards.com/main/electric...4431924759.htm

So we are both fairly equal in regard to our fondness for overkill.

December 8, 2015	#75
Cole_Robbie Tomatovillian™ Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Illinois, zone 6 Posts: 8,407	You're looking at the "watt equivalent" number. My 65 is the actual watts consumed. I thought it was a 300 watt equivalent, but the Menard's link lists an "incandescent equivalent" number of 260 watts: http://www.menards.com/main/electric...4431924759.htm So we are both fairly equal in regard to our fondness for overkill.