View Single Post
Old July 11, 2017   #3
MadScientist
Tomatovillian™
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Minneapolis MN
Posts: 25
Default

Fascinating article Carolyn--thanks for posting. Looks like root disruption does cause a much more fibrous root system, (as you point out) but that overall yield is ultimately improved by minimizing transplanting and root disruption? Heres the quote I am looking at:

"Since the root system is disturbed and the development of the plant more or less checked at each transplanting, it might be concluded that plants grown from seed sown directly in pots or other containers would grow more vigorously and give a higher yield than those once or twice transplanted. In fact this has been shown by numerous investigations to be the case. That transplanting in itself does not promote an early crop nor an increased yield has been also clearly demonstrated. In an experiment in Wisconsin

'three crops of tomatoes were grown . . . In each case seeds were planted singly in 6-inch pots in the greenhouse; when the plants were about 2 inches in height, two-thirds of the whole number were dug up and reset in the same pots; later, one-half of these were again transplanted in a similar manner. As soon as weather permitted, 10 plants of each lot were knocked from the pots and set 4 by 8 feet apart in open ground, every precaution being taken to avoid injury to the roots.'

Those not transplanted yielded more than those once transplanted, while those twice transplanted yielded least. The total for 10 plants with each treatment during a 3-year period was, 1,175, 1,131, and 1,001 pounds, respectively.
"

Seems like the conventional wisdom is to transplant--am I misunderstanding?

Aaron
MadScientist is offline   Reply With Quote