View Single Post
Old May 15, 2014   #127
Worth1
Tomatovillian™
 
Worth1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Den of Drunken Fools
Posts: 38,539
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon1234 View Post
For the first two you need at least a double check back flow preventer.
The last you need something better like a vacuum breaker of reduced pressure back flow preventer.

It depends on your system layout. A double check back flow preventer is an expensive device and usually only required when using a municipal water supply and injecting chemicals. A vacuum breaker directly after the faucet with a one way swing check valve is all that is really necessary when on a well. If your faucet is the highest point in the system then there is even less to worry about.

Municipalities need to worry about this stuff because most outside faucets are hooked directly to the main line that comes in to the house. If you are injecting chemicals and they suffer a sudden pressure drop the pressure/water in your system could allow for back syphoning to occur and draw chemicals into the municipal water supply.

On a well there is not usually a back syphoning problem to worry about. If the system is designed properly with air vent breakers at the high points then water should never cause a syphoning effect unless the whole system is under water from a flood or some such thing.

A lot of the "gear" that is sold is designed for businesses who are dealing with much nastier stuff than fertilizer.
You need to re think your statements not all of them are correct.
At least not in Texas and any other place I know.

That so called (gear) you mentioned is required by law here.

Worth
Worth1 is offline   Reply With Quote