Tomatoville® Gardening Forums


Notices

Forum area for discussing hybridizing tomatoes in technical terms and information pertinent to trait/variety specific long-term (1+ years) growout projects.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old February 25, 2013   #32
frogsleap farm
Tomatovillian™
 
frogsleap farm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 568
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marktutt View Post
I will not pretend to have the level of understanding that you or Mark McCaslin have in this area, but my intuition tells me what you are describing is accurate when introgressing new genes from a a wild species.

However, in the case of genes that have already been introgressed into established breeding lines or the hybrids such as Iron Lady being used as sources of the genes, wouldn't that genetic cruft have already been dealt with?
SNPs are abundant and it is not difficult finding one either in the gene/allele of interest, or more likely just adjacent to the locus. As Mark Tutt suggests functional SNPs identified as markers for established traits are tightly linked and don't segregate. Dar is right that in the process of identifying an effective SNP marker for a new trait you need to do some range finding and evaluate mulitple markers. My interest is in stacking established traits for which effective SNP markers have already been identified and validated. Molecular markers, primarily SNPs, are now commonly used in plant breeding for this purpose.
frogsleap farm is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:52 AM.


★ Tomatoville® is a registered trademark of Commerce Holdings, LLC ★ All Content ©2022 Commerce Holdings, LLC ★